Black Hole Doesn't Exist Indian Scientist Have Proven It

Almost everyone knows about The Black Hole i.e. Krishna Vivar, but still it is necessary to tell first what is the Black Hole, Black Hole is an object in the space whose gravity is so strong even light can't escape from it. Passion, that is, the escape velocity of the Black Hole is more than the speed of light, due to its too much gravity, it is also believed that its mass is absorbed in one point, what we call singularity, and where no physics laws works, today the Black Hole in Science has become a very popular topic, that many science fiction videos are formed on it, and on the basis of this, . The movie has also been formed, which is called Interstellar, time travel is also concepted by this, in this way, every person knows this topic of black hole, due to the science fiction associated with it, everybody wants to know it, well, this was the story of the Black Hole but Indian scientist Prof.Abhas Kumar Mitra ji has rejected the black hole theory by his research, and he has given it the correct form of the object and has named it "Eternal Collapsing Object", now let know how the Indian scientists have proved the black hole theory wrong :-

In 1998, Indian scientist Prof. Abhas Kumar Mitra said that the mathematical black hole which is being considered is not practically present, and which is coming in the observation, it is not a mathematical black hole but it is Quasi black holes, practically Not only the black hole, but the black holes which have been discovered it did not even exist but in the theory of Prof.Mitra, It is 'ECO' called "Eternally Collapsing Object", in 2000, Mitra Ji's "Research Paper" appeared in the Foundation of Physics, In which they mathematically Proved that the black hole did not exist, but rather these objects are different from the Black Hole, which is called ECO, So lets find out what is 'ECO' -

:-Eternal Collapsing Object(ECO)

It is such an object that is like a ball of fire, that is, it is a very large star that looks like a mathematical black hole, but very few photons from this star come out of its surface, its gravity is much more Due to its heat and light it gets very little from its surface, i.e. one of the trillions comes out of the photon, temp of these objects. It is too much, it can be millions more times than our sun, radiation also moves out of this object and has very strong magnetic field, it has both gravity and radiation force, like the other stars, radiation force looks out on this object and gravity inside, due to the Strong magnetic field, it is called Magnetospheric eternal collapsing object, it does not have singularity and does not even have an event horizon and an apparent horizon like the Blake Hall Continuous collapse occurs, However, as this collapse occurs, its collapsing rate decreases, so it will take an infinite time to reach the level of singularity altogether i.e. that will continue to collapse or say that it will never be able to achieve singularity, that is why It is called eternally collapsing object.

:-Difference Between Black Hole And ECO

The Black Hole And The ECO Has Difference, Literally

The Black Hole is an mathematical concept which does not exist practically, while observations suggests the one we're considering as black hole is the same ECU.
ECO has strong magnetic field, while black hole has no magnetic field, according to some scientist it has low magnetic field.
In black hole is considered of event horizon and apparent horizon while in ECO they are not both in.
From the surface of black hole photon can not escape , while in ECO very less photons can escape.
Black Hole has singularity while ECO has no singularity.
Physics rules do not work in Black Hole, While they work in ECO.

:-When they presented his concept

In 1976 Stephen Hawking his self created The Black Hole Information
paradox and tries to solve it own, while Prof.Abhas has solved this 13
years before Stephen Hawking, and Stephen Hawking has said in 2006
There are no black holes, while Prof.Abhas Kumar Mitra has proved it in 2000,
although Stephen Hawking has the trend in media, but a American scientist

Richard A. Muller has said about him :- I think Mr.Mitra has solved the black hole
paradox very early then Stephen Hawking, and solved in a superior war.

In 2014, Radio Channel SBS of Australia took an Interview of Prof.Abhas Kumar Mitra, which you can listen to here, Mitra ji also expressed the sadness of the fact that our Indians scientist does not support Indian scientists, they Ignores In fact, it is true of Mitra ji that our mindset has become so that the outside scientists or scholars say that which matters to them and we value them more authentic.

In this way we have a matter of pride for the Indians that our Indian scientist has done proven wrong The Blake Hall and given a new theory.